[UPDATE: Noam is done. But I had some issues with linking. See my comments] Task #18: Inputting theparson’s outstanding research

July 19, 2007

Aside from Charles and song_and_dance_man, the one LGFer who really helped me the most was “theparson” (who I believe doesn’t post much anymore, if at all). The last email from theparson contained a whole big pile of info, and I can’t remember how much of it I already integrated into the dictionary.

So, whoever takes on this task needs to simply browse through theparson’s research entry-by-entry, and make sure that it is already part of the relevant definitions. If one particular bit of research is still unimplemented, then stick it in the appropriate entry.

It could well be that all of this is already integrated, or that none of it is — I’ve long forgotten. But I have a suspicion that some of it already is, and some isn’t. So, go for it:

“LLL
4/25/2003: We Got Mail!
#110 European-American 4/25/2003 09:59PM PST
Another great example of the LLL (Loony Left Logic).
Suddenly they’ve discovered country music.
So what other country artists have the IDIOTARIANS discovered?

Q. Whatís LLL?
A. Loony Liberal Left or Leftist, or Loony Left Logic (depending on context). Also referred to as L3, L3, or el cubo. LLL first used on LGF by Robert Brandtjen; first used on LGF with a definition (Loony Left Logic) by European-American. ìEl cuboî first used on LGF by scaramouche.
———————————————————————
Fisking
5/21/2002: an extremist at marist college
#3 John B. 5/21/2002 11:00AM PST
“Dr.” Alomari needs one of these under his turban to protect him from the Zionist Mind Control Rays© beamed down on the American Public© by the Zionist Black Helicopters©.
Nice thorough fisking there, Charles.

Q. Whatís ìfiskingî? It sounds vaguely dirty.
A. No, it isnít dirty. Itís derived from Robert Fisk (hmm, on the other handÖ ) and refers to a point-by-point debunking of the kind of lies and/or idiocies written by those of the Robert Fisk persuasion.
——————————————————————————————
Kossack
5/1/2002: end of the probe
#12 J Lichty 5/1/2002 05:29PM PST
This quote from a Jerusalem Post article was too delicsious to pass up.
Here is the URL for the full article of Arab reaction to the disbanding of the UN “Fact” finding team, which is worth reading.
http://www.jpost.com…
In Jordan, the Arab Human Rights Organization denounced Annan’s statement, saying in a press release that the United Nations has “lost its credibility, neutrality and independence.” The group said Arab states should consider withdrawing from the international body.
Well now were getting somewhere. If anyone was worried about the effect of keeping Kofi’s Kossacks out of Jenin, it is looking pretty good.

Or
4/3/2004: Kerry’s Site Delinks Daily Kos
#46 The Commissar 4/3/2004 07:09PM PST
The comments at Kerry’s site ARE amazing. but those are the Kossacks. My favorite was the one against “sensorship.”
“Kerry delinked out of fear?” Maybe. But it was the right action. Let it be.
Tonight, let’s let the Kossacks diss Kerry.

———————————————————————-
Pajamarines
9/19/2004: Thought for the Day
32 Bayonet 9/19/2004 09:45AM PST
While the Army is my alma mater ( 3 years MI including 17.5 months in the “rear with the beer” in theater during our attempt to liberate South Vietnam and two years National Guard service- artillery) . . .
I submit for your consideration that justifiably aggressive and truth-seeking bloggers would be
aptly described as:
———————————————————————–
PajaMARINES
A proposal made more honorable by the fact that the Marines bounced Dan Rather when he tried to become one.
“Always Faithful,
The Few,
The Uncompromising,
The PajaMarines . . . .”
“We Can Handle The Truth”
HuuRah!
————————————————————————
Zionist Hair Rays
7/27/2004: Terrorists Obtain S. Africa Passports
#114 evariste 7/28/2004 09:18AM PST
LOL! Bore is right. Each time I noticed him, it was for saying something stupid, usually a moronic one-liner, so he’s certainly distinguished himself with mediocrity :-)
What is it with these creepy trolls? It seems like you’re always one of the first people they somehow sense with their icky stalks or whatever those things are, slimy trolling tendrils, trolldar, somehow you always end up an object of their unwanted affections. Been wearing that scent lately? Or just zionist hair rays doing their thing :-)

————————————————————————–
Oil for Palaces
10/31/2002: Itís About Oooiiiillll
#43 GKarp 10/31/2002 02:18PM PST
The proposition that the conflict with Iraq is all about oil suffers from at least two fatal flaws.
First, as several posters have pointed out, the cheapest most efficient way to get the oil would be to buy it, even as the most dangerous and costly way to get the oil is to send troops and risk Iraqi oilfields going the way of Kuwait’s in ‘91. It took a year to put those fires out. If you think this is the US’s best effort to get access to Iraqi you must believe that US policymakers are irrational.
Even worse, the proposition that this is a war for oil must fail because it is non-falsifiable; there is no state of affairs in which it could be proved untrue. The US since the first Bush administration has pursued a policy of sanction and embargo against Iraq, restricting oil exports to what flows through the UN’s oil for palaces- er, food- program. Decreasing supply naturally tends to raise prices which benefits big corporate oil interests (say, Halliburton for instance). Now the US proposes to change policy to one of Iraqi liberation which will either 1) shut down Iraqi production entirely or, 2) increase Iraqi production markedly. Each of these scenarios is decried as being “for the oil.” If the proposition that US policy is all about oil is always true no matter what policy the US adopts, the claim has no meaning.
One could just skip all this and accept that the US is defending itself against an aggressive sadistic madman intent on the acquisition and probable use of WMD, but it is harder to fit on a bumper sticker. Its also scarier to believe we cannot reform ourselves into making this go away. If the problem was our appetites rather than Saddam’s ambition then no one would have to get hurt. Just ain’t so.

———————————————————————
joooooos
(I searched this using 6 “o”’s, 5 “o”’s, 4 “o”’s and 3 “o”’s. The oldest uses 4 “o”’s and is below.
2/21/2003: Hanging Chads, Anyone?
piglet 2/22/2003 10:18AM PST
“Al Jazeera will be broadcasting what is shaping up to be a non U.N. backed brutal urban seige by white, english speaking nations against Muslims, with many casualties on both sides — that this occurs on Shrub’s watch is freaking out the middle class and all sane people everywhere big time.”
Funny, how the arabs are “brown” people and
Israeli’s who are also 5′8″ tall, with the same curlly brown
hair and brown eyes, and the same desert tan are “evil white colonialists.”
Oh “english speaking” because the US army has a large
percentage of “people of color” which would
undermine the attempt tp make this a race thing.
And the Kurds are “white” right?
What about the “gypsies” that europe is still abusing,
are they “white” or people of color.
Of course my people were oppressed and enslaved in
Egypt while most of OLD Europe was still wearing
animal skins and trying to figure out how to make
fire. But that doesn’t count because we are JEWS,
Jews, joooosssss!!!
Oh and you should get your ass off occupied aboriginial land now, because you know damn well they
were “walking the dreamtime” while your ancestors
were trying to steal fire from your neighbors who had already figured out how to make it themselves.

————————————————————–
Jordyptian
9/25/2002: Arafatís Jewish Friend at UN
#84 Model4 10/16/2002 04:40PM PST
#69 If that were true they wouldn’t stand for an Egyptian dictator.
And here I thought Kuwait belonged to the Kuwaitis. So why did the Jordyptians (ok, I’ll play along) “Palestinians” ally themselves with Saddam? Oh, that’s right, the “dead jew” platform.
Anyhow, I’m sure there was a child murdered somewhere in the world today. I’ll let you go out to dance and pass out candy. ”

Entry Filed under: Tasks. .

14 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Noam Sayin  |  July 19, 2007 at 2:45 pm

    If I understand this correctly, this is merely a data entry exercise. This would be good for those of use who could maybe use a little practice and experience actually creating entries.

  • 2. zombie  |  July 19, 2007 at 2:48 pm

    Yeah, it looks overwhelming, but actually, as you said, it’s just “data entry.” Not that difficult when you get right down to it.

    Does this mean you volunteer, or are you just nonchalantly strolling by and commenting?

  • 3. Noam Sayin  |  July 19, 2007 at 2:52 pm

    I’m scrolling through, but thought I could handle this one. May as well take the low-hanging fruit.

  • 4. zombie  |  July 19, 2007 at 3:09 pm

    OK, Noam, there’s no backing out now: this task is yours!

    If it isn’t already clear, what theparson’s research was all about was finding the first instance that each term was used on LGF. He did several searches through the LGF archives. So all you have to do is go to each entry, see if it has theparson’s info already in the definition. If it does, move to the next one. If it doesn’t, then see if the definition has an earlier citation already included. If none (most likely), then append a thing to the end of the definition that says, basically,

    ” [First documented use of [WORD]: lgf-user 8/27/200X 07:49AM PST]”

    …with the user and date being a link to the comment that parson found.

  • 5. Noam Sayin  |  July 19, 2007 at 3:31 pm

    I’ll keep everyone apprised of my progress here in the comments.

  • 6. Noam Sayin  |  July 19, 2007 at 5:39 pm

    LLL seems to check out as up to date. However, I’m not sure if I’m running my search query correctly. Maybe someone more skilled can check mywork and instruct otherwise.

    Searching LGF, comments from Feb. 7 2001 to April 16, 2003 where comments=”LLL”

    I’m getting, 3,339 matches. That shouldn’t be right.

  • 7. Noam Sayin  |  July 19, 2007 at 6:42 pm

    Fisking seems to check out.

  • 8. Noam Sayin  |  July 19, 2007 at 7:13 pm

    Alright, I kind of hosed the Kossacks entry. I included theparson’s references to first use on LGF, however, my coding for linking to the actual posts is not going so well, and the size of the typeface gets smaller.

  • 9. Noam Sayin  |  July 19, 2007 at 7:14 pm

    I think I’ll lay off for the night and try to figure out what I did wrong.

    All the information is there, it just doesn’t sync up with the rest of the post.

  • 10. zombie  |  July 19, 2007 at 7:24 pm

    “8. Noam Sayin | July 19th, 2007 at 7:13 pm
    Alright, I kind of hosed the Kossacks entry. “

    I think I was able to fix “Kossacks”: cleaned up some crazy-ass code. The fonts are all the same size now, and it’s pretty understandable.

  • 11. Noam Sayin  |  July 23, 2007 at 2:53 pm

    Editing in here. Nobody close the door.

  • 12. Noam Sayin  |  July 23, 2007 at 3:15 pm

    Okay. someone needs to keep an eye on me, I guess. I tracked down the first use of Pajamarine and linked it, but I’m having trouble getting the link to embed into the text. I’m trying to use the template this time but still getting the same problem. Also, my edited text is smaller than the dictionary default.

    This is why I picked this easy task. I knew I’d have trouble with code. If someone can teach me what I’m doing wrong, you’ll be the better man or woman for it.

  • 13. Noam Sayin  |  July 23, 2007 at 4:37 pm

    For some reason, I can not get the link to embed into the text. I tried Zombie’s template; I’ve read through my work character by character. In the end, I just went over to the LGF comment box and used the link function to shorten my work, but these links still don’t work here.

    If anyone can point out what I’m doing, I’ll be much obliged.

  • 14. Noam Sayin  |  July 23, 2007 at 4:38 pm

    And another thing you’ll notice is that everything I pasted into the definition came out a little smaller. I have no idea how to fix this.

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Pages

Meta

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Rogue on LGF Dictionary
the poster formerly … on Welcome, visitors, to the new …
the poster formerly … on Implementing Suggestions from …
the poster formerly … on Progress Report: new definitio…
the poster formerly … on Sandbox

Categories

Calendar

July 2007
M T W T F S S
    Aug »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

Archives

Links

Feeds